The Sportster custom was never on my list of priority bike to test because it failed at every hurdle for me. Firstly it was a Sportster. Secondly it was a Sportster that was trying not to be a Sportster. Lastly it was an 883 Sportster. Oh dear.
Still, it needed doing not least because the Stage One 883 wed had out the previous week was not happy and we needed confirmation of that. That the only other 883 available was a bog-standard 53C did nothing to improve my mood, but the sun was out and youve got to take the rough with the smooth. Id given the XLH883 one last chance to come good on the run down from South Cheshire to Northampton but apart from an increasing certainty that it was set up badly, somewhere down the line, it didnt. I handed it over, muttering something about checking the timing, at least, and went out to give the 53C the once-over. No chance
of being inconspicuous, was my first reaction on sight of the pearl white
baby custom, but I did look at it properly for the first time. Solid rear
wheel from the parts bin, twenty-one inch front wheel from the same source.
By the time
wed cleared the traffic from resurfacing roadworks outside Wayside,
the motor was good and warm, and ready to roll so it was time to lay the
spectre to rest. The shorter
shocks, shared with the Hugger, meant that the tarmac was always closer
than it had been on the stock model, but the frame was the same, and as
stiff as both it, and the 1200S demanded: the lower seat height of both
the 53C and the Hugger take their toll of the cornering clearance but
it still ranks up there with the sportier Dynas - courtesy of extra long
shocks - and the surprising Deuce which gets its extra from the low-profile
rear tyre. I never ran out of clearance on either side, it has to be said,
or at least not in a way that sticks in my mind, but then as a rider of
big twins, The confidence-inspiring
cornering and revvier motor knocked back any concerns regarding the oversteer
of the 883, but then corners were arriving more quickly, and the weight
and balance of the steering were well suited to the role. Just as the tight chassis inspired confidence, so too did the brakes, being the twin-pot items fitted to everything nowadays - a single front and rear - were more than up to the job, as indeed is the same combination on a surprising number of big twin models. This was the bike I expected the XLH883 to be and I was glad to have buried the experience of the poorly set-up example. What I really want to know now is how the Stage One should have felt, because this was showing real potential.
I still
wouldnt actively seek a Sportster for distance work because there
are so many better bikes without leaving the Harley stable, and Id
be happy to pay the higher price, Slightly
more Heath-Robinson were the rods that linked the control levers to their
original locations: The only regrets are that we didnt have the 1200C alongside to compare and contrast the feel of the engines one after the other - which is the only way to make an objective observation - and indeed that the original XLH883 with Stage One kit was so bad, because Id love to know how much difference to the engine the free breathing carb and pipes made. Still, all-in-all, and despite earlier misgivings, the 53C lives in my memory as the Sportster that I could imagine owning but not in white, and only if I didnt need a bike to do any serious distances on. Back in 1998 Harley-Davidson launched two new models into the European theatre, designed to appeal much more to European taste than to their home market. One of those models was of course the mean black Softail dubbed the Night Train, which so astonished the public that the other model launched as its Euro-specific stablemate was very much left in its shadow. That model was the XL53C Sportster Custom 53, a mealy mouthful that is now more usually referred to as the 53C. Though
overshadowed by its bigger companion, in no way would I like to infer
that the 53C has in any way been a failure. There are a lot of them about
- in Britain at least - and its not too difficult to understand
why: the 53C is a handsome piece of kit. An 883cc, it asks an extra £800
over the price of the base model, making it the most expensive baby
Sportster in 2001, but that extra money offers a much higher level of
trim. With forward-set front pegs, unmistakable solid rear wheel, that
single riser tower gripping the fairly flat bars and a sleek gunfighter
type seat, the 53C does cut a dash. But whether Harley-Davidson caught
the European taste with this machine as they so obviously managed with
the Night Train is definitely debatable. Nevertheless, the 53C feels much more of a finished concept than its cheaper brothers, the XLH & Hugger 883s, both of which offer a better blank canvas for potential owner modification. If the 53C floats your boat, then a stage one or two on the motor and thats about it, Bobs your Auntie. If the 53C doesnt float your boat, then there is absolutely no point in buying one, get a plain old XL and your extra £800 is better spent on taking it the direction you personally want your Sportster to go.
A possible
improvement over the 1998 53C though is at least the instrument console
on With such a minimal seat and fairly stiff rear low suspension the ride is quite uncompromising, much like any other Sporty, except a Sportster rider can normally compensate somewhat by moving around a bit, taking the weight off their bum. This is by reason of the siting of their front pegs, which although not right underneath the rider, still allows the rider to transfer some of their weight through their feet. No such luck with the 53C: legs out in front, youre stuck there and thats that. That the cruising-style forward sets should actually inhibit comfortable long distance cruising is bonkers - and smacks of style before useful function.
Handling is okay, the frame is still a Sportster after all and is a stable, stiff and secure platform. But again that ability to handle is marred. Whereas an ordinary XL883 Sportster allows at least some vigourous bend taking before grinding out, the 53C grinds out all too soon, losing a full two degrees of lean on the left and a staggering 5 degrees on the right! That makes this fairly little bike almost as ungainly as your average Big Twin.
That the engine is so under-utilised is a shame, but inevitable given the unfair constraints imposed on it by various environment agencies. Luckily much of that potential can be legally released once purchase has been made, but even so, that the owner should be asked to cough up another £500 at least on top of that purchase price to get to it doesnt really seem all that fair. Having said that of course, its a distinct possibility that many 53C owners dont bother to release any more power from the motor! After all, what would be the point if the 53C, set up as it is, doesnt really allow you to get the best out of all that extra oomph anyway? All in all,
the XL 53C ends up being a bit of a dogs dinner, not quite Specifications
|