 |
|
|
Evolution
Pan ?
Words
and pics: Rich
King
There
will be those of you out there who will be feeling physically sick
browsing through the pictures here of Ginge's 1950 Pan. 'How could
such a thing be allowed to happen to such a machine?' you may well
be asking yourself.

|
Others
however will be thinking 'Phwooaarr, that's what I call a motorcycle!
It's obviously well used and well looked after.'
Why?
Because
there is definitely more than one school of thought when faced with a
venerable machine like Ginge's old Pan. One
or two of these schools, like any other form of philosophic, academic
or religious thinking can actually degenerate into that 'We're right,
why can't everyone else see how wrong they are' dogma which is not too
far removed from 'Burn the heretics'. And sometimes you get the feeling
that if they felt they could, they would.
One school
argues vehemently that such an important piece of classic Americana should
be painstaking restored to its original showroom spec. While others take
reverence one step further and insist that while the machine should of
course be totally original, each component should be polished and preened
beyond perfect. Yet others, more lenient perhaps at first sight, suggest
quite rightly that an owner in 1950 most likely would not have kept his
or her machine standard then. So
it is in keeping, nay, practically essential that the machine, as an important
historical document, should be customised as it would have been then,
with (and only with) those contemporary custom goodies that were available
then. And preferably of course, with official goodies from the relevant
Parts and Accessories catalogue.
Mmm, fair
points. So yeah, if there's an example of each school of thought's Pan
in a museum somewhere, well okay, fair enough. I suppose.
Because
the trouble with any of these arguments, at least in my opinion, is that
none of them seem to actually view these machines as living, breathing
motorcycles in 2002. If they're not dead why kill them, stuff them and
put them on display. But see, I'm starting to preach now. And there's
also a danger that I could be seen to be trying to defend the fact that
this Pan isn't all shiny and restored, I'm not. And neither, much more
importantly, would Ginge.
Because
as far as I can tell (and I do know Ginge pretty well - he's a mate and
we go way back) Ginge is totally oblivious to any of these arguments.
He has owned this motorcycle for ages: he bought it to ride it, it's on
the road and it's still evolving, as any serious road bike does. His
Pan is designed to be ridden and it is. Last year he rode the machine
through France for instance, covering over 600 trouble free miles in just
a few days. He doesn't pretend that he rode it particularly hard, that's
not the way he rides the Pan anyway - he has a Hinckley Triumph for that
- the Pan is built for club runs, high-days and holidays, to cover distance
comfortably and fairly sedately. As Ginge points out, what's the point
of going somewhere new if you're going too fast to enjoy the view? And
who amongst us wouldn't want to ride his Pan? Imagine it burbling happily
away all day at a steady 50/55mph through lush French countryside on open,
well made roads stretching to the horizon and pulling over in some sun-struck
village for a crisp golden bagette, paté de maison and a carafe
of rich red wine?
what d'ya mean y'don't like paté?
Many custom
bikes are stylistically static; by which I mean once built they are rarely
changed while on the road, but then are usually quite radically altered
again once they are sold and/or taken off the road for a winter re-build
and re-style. Ginge's Pan though isn't designed to be a show-stopper,
it stays on the road as much as possible and changes are made gradually,
as pocket, taste or practicality determine. While most cycle parts are
Harley, many are not contemporary with the age of the engine and are chosen
as much, if not more so, for personal comfort as an aesthetically pleasing
addition.
The
front footboards for instance were finally bolted on for purely comfort
reasons, Ginge didn't actually like them previously, but after riding
with them and discovering how comfortable they were, the boards stayed
on. It's not like they look out of place now either. Like wise the Fat
Boy handlebars, which went on after finally getting over his huge Apehanger
fetish. Again the 'bars are comfortable, practical and almost as a convenient
afterthought look dead right too.
Interestingly
the bike is a hell of a lot more 'standard' than would first appear. The
motor, or at least, its component parts, are still much as Milwaukee intended
52 years ago, but that's as much down to Ginge's uncanny ability with
a spanner as it is to Harley-Davidson's. He
knows the engine backwards, re-builds it for fun and constantly stays
on top of it. When the gearbox literally split into two halves, Ginge
fixed it. Most people would have immediately sought help - be it mechanical
or psychiatric, but Ginge just shrugged and got on with it.
But he has
an affinity with metal - how many people keep a self-made forge in their
girlfriend's back garden? Or indeed, have made her a perfect steel and
brass replica of the fantastic Anglo-Saxon helmet found at Sutton Hoo
for her birthday because he couldn't think of anything to buy her? Not
that many.
Some
'performance' modifications have been made to the motor, it features solid
lifters now for instance and the original 1950 61ci/1000cc barrels have
been replaced by 74ci/1200cc barrels.
So although
the original motor dates back to 1950, both the top end and the bottom
end have evolved over time out of the original spec. For instance, Ginge's
gearbox clearly is a foot change, but Harley-Davidson didn't offer a foot
change option on Pans until 1952, until then all EL Hydra-Glides had been
hand shift only - and 1952 saw the end of the line for the 61 cube "EL".
So too the 74ci/1200cc "FL" top end on Ginge's Pan, but as with
any working motorcycle, modifications happen naturally to improve them
or just to keep them on the road
and an awful lot can happen in
52 years. Drawing
comparisons between Ginge's Pan as it is now and how it rolled off the
production line is an academic exercise, albeit fairly interesting, but
pretty pointless if truth be told. At the end of the day it's a nice motorcycle,
full stop.
Never one
to be afraid of trying something new to see what happens, the thing that
bugs Ginge the most at the moment is the paintwork - something else he
also does himself and usually to a very fine standard. However the polyester
powder paint, which worked so successfully on the Wishbone frame, creating
a rock hard and attractive finish, reacted to the petrol tank (or something)
and bubbled up and flaked off of the right hand tank. Shouldn't be two
long before it bugs him enough to strip it off and try something else
though. What
he's dead chuffed about at the moment is the tool box, hanging pannier
like off of the left hand side- an army surplus ammo box which cost him
four quid. All I know, is if I'd bought an un-painted army surplus ammo
box for four quid to use as a tool box on any Harley classic or no, it
would've looked shite. Why Ginge's looks just right is totally beyond
me, but it just does.
During his
latest French adventure he spotted a local Springer Softail which had
been painted black
all over. He reckoned for an idea so simple
yet almost staggeringly bold it looked the absolute business - Ginge was
especially struck by the all-black springer front end. I'd guess that
copy-cat modification to his own springers isn't that far off, if he hasn't
done it already. A sort of original version of the FXSTSB "Bad Boy".
More
than most, this feature is a snapshot of the Pan as it is now - or at
least as it was in November 2001 when I travelled down to Somerset on
the West Coast of England to photograph it. It will almost certainly have
been altered by the time you read this, it'll probably be a subtle change,
but that's evolution at work. Right back to 1950, when the Pan's first
owner perused the options list, the EL became non-standard. Over time
the motorcycle has been altered time and time again to each new owners
personal taste and requirement. The process didn't stop when Ginge bought
it, and his Pan will certainly continue to evolve for at least as long
as he owns it.
Specifications
|
Owner:
|
Ginge
|
|
Make
& Year:
|
1950
Harley-Davidson EL Hydra Glide Panhead
|
|
Engine:
|
1950
EL (61ci) with FL (74ci) top end, solid lifters and "crap"
cam, 4-speed ratchet lid 'box, "mousetrap" clutch, primary
belt drive conversion
|
|
Carb:
|
SU
- original featuring an air filter but it fell off.
|
|
Ignition:
|
Stock
|
|
Exhaust:
|
Stainless
Shotgun straight through 'pipes, not silenced but a lot better than
just bearable. By Phill.
|
|
Frame:
|
Stock
Harley-Davidson "Wishbone"
|
|
Forks:
|
V-Twin
manufacturing 2-inch over Springers
|
|
Rear
suspension:
|
"Ha!"
|
|
Front
Wheel:
|
21-inch
|
|
Front
Brake:
|
Original
drum - "crap"
|
|
Rear
Wheel:
|
Harley
hub laced to 4-inch wide, 16-inch rim. 130 tyre
|
|
Rear Brake:
|
Original
drum - "good"
|
|
Handlebars:
|
FatBoy
on dogbone risers
|
|
Footrests:
|
All
stock H-D but not necessarily 1950's Panhead
|
|
Controls:
|
Fairly
stock.
|
|
Seat:
|
"black"
|
|
Mudguards:
|
Front:
"what?", rear: flat
|
|
Petrol
Tank:
|
Twin
3.5 gallon Fat Bobs
|
|
Oil
Tank:
|
Horseshoe
|
|
Paint:
|
Owner
|
|
Chrome:
|
"Coming
off!"
|
|
Polishing:
|
Owner
|
|
Wiring:
|
6-volt
|
|
Lights:
|
Front:
Bates; rear: Diamond
|
|
Engineering:
|
Owner,
with help from Phill.
|
|
Other
details:
|
Several
sissybars: all stainless and easily interchangeable depending on
where he's going and whether he's taking someone.
Tool box: an ammo box 'Best £4 I ever spent.'
|
|